Authors

Main Content

Top Content

Directory of Authors from the Journal and their last article.

Barry ZisholtzView Articles

Volume 20, Number 2Case Review

Clinical Relevance of Petit’s Triangle: A Forgotten Landmark

Scott HalperinJulian SpectorDavid PennBarry Zisholtz

This rare case details a right-sided hydronephrotic kidney herniated through Petit’s triangle. Petit’s triangle is an anatomical landmark that is usually not clinically significant and only alluded to during multiple-choice examinations. This case describes the clinical ramification of this area of weakness and allows us to revisit and relearn the anatomy, and its relevance in clinical practice. [Rev Urol. 2018;20(2):112–114 doi: 10.3909/riu0796] © 2018 MedReviews®, LLC

HerniaPetit’s triangleHydronephrotic kidney

Basir TareenView Articles

Volume 11, Number 4Review Articles

Focal Therapy: A New Paradigm for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer

Treatment Update

Samir S TanejaBasir TareenGuilherme Godoy

Focal therapy has been proposed in recent years as a means of bridging the gap between radical prostatectomy and active surveillance for treatment of prostate cancer. The rationale for focal therapy comes from its success in treating other malignancies. One of the challenges in applying such an approach to the treatment of prostate cancer has been the multifocal nature of the disease. This review addresses the selection of potentially ideal candidates for focal therapy and discusses which modalities are currently being used and proposed for focal therapy. Setting and meeting guidelines for oncologic efficacy is a challenge we must embrace to safely deliver this potentially revolutionary approach to treating men with prostate cancer.[Rev Urol. 2009;11(4):203-212 doi: 10.3909/riu0475]© 2009 MedReviews®, LLC

Prostatic neoplasmsFocal therapyProstate-specific antigenProstatectomyPhotodynamic therapyUltrasound, high-inten sity focused, transrectalCryosurgery

Bela DenesView Articles

Volume 18, Number 3Original Research

Health Economic Impact and Prospective Clinical Utility of Oncotype DX® Genomic Prostate Score

Michael J KemeterPhillip G FebboDavid AlbalaRuixiao LuVincy JohnDylan StoyBela DenesMarybeth McCallAlan W ShindelFrank Dubeck

Prostate cancer (CaP) will be diagnosed in approximately 181,000 American men in 2016. Despite the high number of deaths from CaP in the United States, the disease has a protracted natural history and many men diagnosed with CaP will not die of the disease regardless of treatment. Unfortunately, identification of men with truly indolent/nonaggressive CaP is challenging; limitations of conventional diagnostic modalities diminish the ability of physicians to accurately stage every case of CaP based on biopsy results alone. The resulting uncertainty in prognosis may prompt men with low-risk CaP to proceed to morbid and expensive treatments for an unclear survival benefit. Incorporation of the Genomic Prostate Score (GPS) as part of the decision algorithm for patients with National Comprehensive Cancer Network very low-risk and low-risk cancer led to a substantial increase in uptake of active surveillance and substantial cost savings. GPS provides physicians and patients with an additional tool in assessing personalized risk and helps guide individual decision making. [Rev Urol. 2016;18(3):123-132 doi: 10.3909/riu0725] © 2016 MedReviews®, LLC

Prostate cancerOncotype DX® GPSGenomic testingHealth economicsClinical utility

Belur PatelView Articles
Ben ChallacombeView Articles

Volume 19, Number 1Review Articles

Systematic Review of Open Versus Laparoscopic Versus Robot-assisted Nephroureterectomy

Systematic Review

Kamran AhmedEmma MullenBen Challacombe

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma is a relatively uncommon malignancy. The gold standard treatment for this type of neoplasm is an open radical nephroureterectomy with excision of the bladder cuff. This systematic review compares the perioperative and oncologic outcomes for the open surgical method with the alternative surgical management options of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy and robot-assisted nephroureterectomy (RANU). MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases were searched using a sensitive search strategy. Article inclusion was then assessed by review of abstracts and full papers were read if more detail was required. In all, 50 eligible studies were identified that looked at perioperative and oncologic outcomes. The range for estimated blood loss when examining observational studies was 296 to 696 mL for open nephroureterectomy (ONU), 130 to 479 mL for laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU), and 50 to 248 mL for RANU. The one randomized controlled trial identified reported estimated blood loss and length of stay results in which LNU was shown to be superior to ONU (P < .001). No statistical significance was found, however, following adjustment for confounding variables. Although statistically insignificant results were found when examining outcomes of RANU studies, they were promising and comparable with LNU and ONU with regard to oncologic outcomes. Results show that laparoscopic techniques are superior to ONU in perioperative results, and the longer-term oncologic outcomes look comparable. There is, however, a paucity of quality evidence regarding ONU, LNU, and RANU; data that address RANU outcomes are particularly scarce. As the robotic field within urology advances, it is hoped that this technique will be investigated further using gold standard research methods. [Rev Urol. 2017;19(1):32-43 doi: 10.3909/riu0691] © 2017 MedReviews®, LLC

Urothelial carcinomaRobot-assisted nephroureterectomyopen nephroureterectomyLaparoscopic nephroureterectomy

Benjamin BreyerView Articles

Volume 21, Number 1Review Articles

Skin Grafting Applications in Urology

Treatment Review

Andrew J CohenGerman PatinoMicha Yin ZhengBenjamin Breyer

Skin grafting is a closure technique widely used in plastic surgery. Urologists may encounter patients with diseases that lead to severe tissue loss due to infection, trauma, burns, malignancy, skin maladies, or primary lymphedema. The development and study of skin harvesting techniques to manage tissue coverage of burns has allowed for great advances and the widening application of skin grafting. As such, there is a growing recognition and application of skin grafts within urology. The aim of surgical treatment and skin grafting within urology is to preserve genital function, improve quality of life, and restore cosmetic damage. In addition to basic technique, this article reviews specific surgical methods employed in reconstruction for patients with Fournier gangrene, buried penis, and hidradenitis suppurativa. Urologists must be aware of these techniques in order to provide adequate counseling for patients considering these operations and when encountering complications. [Rev Urol. 2019;21(1):8–14] © 2019 MedReviews®, LLC

Fournier gangreneSkin grafting techniquesburied penishidradenitis suppurativa

Benjamin H. LowentrittView Articles

Volume 23, Number 3Meet The Expert

Meet the Expert: Shelby Moneer, MS, CHES, from ZERO Prostate Cancer

Benjamin H. Lowentritt

Thank you for joining us today for our third “Meet the Expert” session with our special guest Shelby Moneer. Shelby is vice president of patient programs and education at ZERO Prostate Cancer. I’m your moderator for today, Benjamin Lowentritt. I’m the medical director of the prostate cancer program at Chesapeake Urology, and I am fortunate enough to be one of the medical advisors for ZERO, as well. Today’s “Meet the Expert” is sponsored by Cipla. For more information about Cipla, please visit their website at www.cipla.com.

Prostatic neoplasmspatient advocacy

Benjamin J DaviesView Articles

Volume 19, Number 2Review Articles

The Use of Intraoperative Cell Salvage in Urologic Oncology

Surgical Update

Andres F CorreaMatthew C FerroniTimothy D LyonBenjamin J DaviesMichael C Ost

Intraoperative cell salvage (IOCS) has been used in urologic surgery for over 20 years to manage intraoperative blood loss and effectively minimize the need for allogenic blood transfusion. Concerns about viability of transfused erythrocytes and potential dissemination of malignant cells have been addressed in the urologic literature. We present a comprehensive review of the use of IOCS in urologic oncologic surgery. IOCS has been shown to preserve the integrity of erythrocytes during processing and effectively provides cell filtration to mitigate the risk of tumor dissemination. Its use is associated with reduction in the overall need for allogenic blood transfusion, which clinically reduces the risk of hypersensitivity reactions and disease transmission, and may have important implications on overall oncologic outcomes. In the context of a variety of urologic malignancies, including prostate, urothelial, and renal cancer, the use of IOCS appears to be safe, without risk of tumor spread leading to metastatic disease or differences in cancer-specific and overall survival. IOCS has been shown to be an effective intraoperative blood management strategy that appears safe for use in urologic oncology surgery. The ability to reduce the need for additional allogenic blood transfusion may have significant impact on immune-mediated oncologic outcomes. [Rev Urol. 2017;19(2):89–96 doi: 10.3909/riu0721] © 2017 MedReviews®, LLC

Urologic oncologyCell salvagetransfusion

Benjamin M BruckerView Articles

Volume 18, Number 3Meeting Reviews

Highlights From the 2016 American Urological Association Annual Meeting

Benjamin M BruckerDean G AssimosEllen ShapiroAlan W PartinMichael B ChancellorStacy LoebJ Curtis NickelMichael A GorinMichael K Brawer

More than 2000 posters, abstracts, and videos were presented at the 2016 American Urological Association (AUA) Annual Meeting, held in San Diego, CA, from May 6 to 10, 2016. The editors of Reviews in Urology have culled an enormous volume of information from this premier source and present the findings that are most relevant to the practicing urologist. [Rev Urol. 2016;18(3):159-173 doi:10.3909/riu0717] © 2016 MedReviews®, LLC

Prostate cancerActive surveillanceDisorders of sexual developmentNephrolithiasisOveractive bladderMicrobiomeOnabotulinumtoxinAHemorrhagic cystitisInflammationFour kallikrein assayGenomic prostate score

Benjamin MercierView Articles

Volume 23, Number 2Case of the Quarter

Case of the Quarter: Kaposi Sarcoma in a Patient With Testicular Germ Cell Tumor and HIV: A Case Report and Literature Review

Daniela V. CastroDonald HannounTanya B. DorffAlexander Chehrazi-RaffleWesley YipAbhishek TripathiBenjamin MercierRegina Barragan-CarrilloHedyeh EbrahimiSalvador Jaime-Casas

Testicular germ cell tumors are the leading cause of cancer in male patients 15 to 39 years old. Extensive treatments are available, and the regimen of choice depends on clinical, laboratory, and histopathologic characteristics. Patients with HIV are at increased risk of developing solid malignancies, including testicular germ cell tumors. All patients with HIV should start on highly active antiretroviral therapy, but the drug interactions between chemotherapy for testicular germ cell tumor and highly active antiretroviral therapy have not been extensively evaluated. This case review highlights the importance of optimal therapeutic agent selection in patients with HIV and solid malignancies.

Testicular neoplasmGerm cellHIVTesticular neoplasmsSarcoma

Benjamin PressView Articles

Volume 20, Number 1Review Articles

Differentiating Molecular Risk Assessments for Prostate Cancer

Risk Assessment Review

Michael SchulsterMarc A BjurlinBenjamin Press

It is critically important to the evolving goals of prostate biopsy to find clinically significant cancer with lethal potential and avoid detection of indolent disease. Better tests and markers are required for improved detection of clinically significant prostate cancer and avoidance of biopsies in men with indolent disease. Currently, there are myriad alternative prostate cancer risk-assessment tests available derived from serum and urine that are designed to improve the specificity for detection of “significant” prostate cancer. Herein we discuss these tests and their clinical implications. [Rev Urol. 2018;20(1):12–18 doi: 10.3909/riu0787] © 2018 MedReviews, LLC®

Prostate cancerScreeningProstate-specific antigenBiomarkersPSA

Benjamin R LeeView Articles
Benjamin T ShurtleffView Articles
Benoit PeyronnetView Articles

Volume 20, Number 2Review Articles

Botulinum Toxin Use in Neurourology

Systematic Review

Benjamin M BruckerGregory VurtureBenoit PeyronnetXavier GaméVictor W Nitti

The use of botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) has revolutionized the treatment of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) over the past three decades. Initially, it was used as a sphincteric injection for detrusor sphincter dyssynergia but now is used mostly as intradetrusor injection to treat neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO). Its use is supported by high-level-of-evidence studies and it has become the gold-standard treatment for patients with NDO refractory to anticholinergics. Several novelties have emerged in the use of BTX-A in neurourology over the past few years. Although onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®, Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA) remains the only BTX-A for which use is supported by large, multicenter, randomized, controlled trials (RCT), and is therefore the only one to be licensed in the United States and Europe, a second BTX-A, abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Basking Ridge, NJ), is also supported by high-level-of-evidence studies. Other innovations in the use of BTX-A in neurourology during the past few years include the BTX switch (from abobotulinumtoxinA to onabotulinumtoxinA or the opposite) as a rescue option for primary or secondary failures of intradetrusor BTX-A injection and refinements in intradetrusor injection techniques (number of injection sites, injection into the trigone). There is also a growing interest in long-term failure of BTX-A for NDO and their management, and a possible new indication for urethral sphincter injections. [Rev Urol. 2018;20(2):84–93 doi: 10.3909/riu0792] © 2018 MedReviews®, LLC

Botulinum toxinNeurogenic detrusor overactivitySphincterInjection

Bernadette MM ZwaansView Articles

Volume 18, Number 2Review Articles

Challenges and Opportunities in Radiation-induced Hemorrhagic Cystitis

Therapeutic Strategy Update

Michael B ChancellorBernadette MM ZwaansHeinz G NicolaiLaura E Lamb

As diagnosis and treatment of cancer is improving, medical and social issues related to cancer survivorship are becoming more prevalent. Hemorrhagic cystitis (HC), a rare but serious disease that may affect patients after pelvic radiation or systemic chemotherapy, has significant unmet medical needs. Although no definitive treatment is currently available, various interventions are employed for HC. Effects of nonsurgical treatments for HC are of modest success and studies aiming to control radiation-induced bladder symptoms are lacking. In this review, we present current and advanced therapeutic strategies for HC to help cancer survivors deal with long-term urologic health issues. [Rev Urol. 2016;18(2):57-65 doi: 10.3909/riu0700] © 2016 MedReviews®, LLC

Hemorrhagic cystitisRadiation-induced cystitisHematuriaCancer survivorship

Betsy D HopsonView Articles

Volume 19, Number 1Review Articles

Urinary Tract Stone Development in Patients With Myelodysplasia Subjected to Augmentation Cystoplasty

Management Update

Dean G AssimosCourtney L ShephardGuaqiao WangBetsy D HopsonErika B Bunt

Patients with myelodysplasia who have undergone augmentation cystoplasty are at risk for urinary tract stones. We sought to determine the incidence and risk factors for stone development in this population. The charts of 40 patients with myelodysplasia who have undergone augmentation cystoplasty were reviewed. None had a prior history of urinary tract stones. All patients were seen on an annual basis with plain abdominal imaging, renal ultrasonography, and laboratory testing. Statistical analysis included a multivariable bootstrap resampling method and Student’s t-test. Fifteen (37.5%) patients developed stones, 14 with bladder stones and 1 with a solitary renal stone, at a mean of 26.9 months after augmentation. Five (33.3%) developed recurrent bladder stones. The patient with a renal stone never developed a bladder stone. The mean follow-up for the stone formers was 117.2 months and for non–stone formers was 89.9 months. The stone incidence per year was 6.8%. Risk factors included a decline in serum chloride after augmentation (P = .02), female sex, younger age at time of augmentation, longer time period since augmentation, and bowel continence. A significant proportion of patients with myelodysplasia subjected to augmentation cystoplasty develop urinary tract stones, predominantly in the bladder. Dehydration may play a role in development of lower urinary tract stones as the decline in serum chloride suggests contraction alkalosis, which could lead to constipation and improved bowel continence. Therefore, improved hydration should be a goal in this cohort. [Rev Urol. 2017;19(1):11-15 doi: 10.3909/riu0741] © 2017 MedReviews®, LLC

NephrolithiasisSpina bifidaNeurogenic bladderaugmentationcystoplasty

Bilal ChughtaiView Articles

Volume 13, Number 3Review Articles

Role of Inflammation in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Disease State Review

Steven A KaplanRichard LeeBilal ChughtaiAlexis E Te

Inflammation of the prostate may represent a mechanism for hyperplastic changes to occur in the prostate. There are a variety of growth factors and cytokines that may lead to a proinflammatory process within the prostate. There are several proposed mechanisms that lead to both the intrinsic and extrinsic basis of inflammation. Prostatic inflammation may represent an important factor in influencing prostatic growth and progression of symptoms. This article reviews the recent literature on inflammation leading to chronic prostatic diseases, such as benign prostatic hyperplasia. [Rev Urol. 2011;13(3):147-150 doi: 10.3909/riu0535] © 2011 MedReviews®, LLC

Benign prostatic hyperplasiaInflammationProstatitisProstatic cytokinesVitamin D

Bill AndrewsView Articles
Björn LöppenbergView Articles

Volume 18, Number 1Review Articles

Contemporary Role of the Decipher® Test in Prostate Cancer Management: Current Practice and Future Perspectives

Management Update

Deepansh DalelaBjörn LöppenbergAkshay SoodJesse SammonFiras Abdollah

We performed a systematic literature search to identify original articles and editorials about the Decipher® Prostate Cancer Test (GenomeDx Biosciences, San Diego, CA) to provide an overview of the current literature and its present role in urologic clinical practice. The Decipher test, which uses the expression of 22 selected RNA markers (from a total of over 1.4 million), showed a very high discrimination in predicting clinical metastasis (0.75-0.83) and cancer-specific mortality (0.78) in external validation studies, outperforming all routinely available clinicopathologic characteristics. Further, the timing of postoperative radiotherapy (adjuvant vs salvage) may be guided based on Decipher scores. The Decipher test was also the only independent predictor of clinical metastasis in patients with biochemical recurrence after surgery. The Decipher Genomic Resource Information Database (GRID) is a novel research tool that captures 1.4 million marker expressions per patient and may facilitate precision-guided, individualized care to patients with prostate cancer. In this era of precision medicine, Decipher, along with the Decipher GRID platform, is a promising genomic tool that may aid in managing prostate cancer patients throughout the continuum of care and delivering appropriate treatment at an individualized level. [Rev Urol. 2016;18(1):1-9 doi: 10.3909/riu0706] © 2016 MedReviews®, LLC

Prostate cancerDecipher® Prostate Cancer TestGenomic classifierNeoplasm recurrenceLocal/surgeryTreatment outcome

Blaine KristoView Articles