Editorial Board About Us

Genomic prostate score

All articles from this key word are listed below.

Volume 16, Number 4 Review Articles

A Guide for Clinicians in the Evaluation of Emerging Molecular Diagnostics for Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer

Diagnosis Update

Michael J Kemeter Phillip G Febbo Steven E Canfield Adam S Kibel H Jeffrey Lawrence Judd W Moul

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening is associated with a decline in prostate cancerrelated mortality. However, screening has also led to overdiagnosis and overtreatment of clinically insignificant tumors. Recently, certain national guidelines (eg, US Preventive Services Task Force) have recommended against PSA screening, which may lead to a reverse-stage migration. Although many prostate tumors are indolent at presentation, others are aggressive and are appropriate targets for treatment interventions. Utilization of molecular markers may improve our ability to measure tumor biology and allow better discrimination of indolent and aggressive tumors at diagnosis. Many emerging commercial molecular diagnostic assays have been designed to provide more accurate risk stratification for newly diagnosed prostate cancer. Unfamiliarity with molecular diagnostics may make it challenging for some clinicians to navigate and interpret the medical literature to ascertain whether particular assays are appropriately developed and validated for clinical use. Herein, the authors provide a framework for practitioners to use when assessing new tissue-based molecular assays. This review outlines aspects of assay development, clinical and analytic validation and clinical utility studies, and regulatory issues, which collectively determine whether tests (1) are actionable for specific clinical indications, (2) measurably influence treatment decisions, and (3) are sufficiently validated to warrant incorporation into clinical practice. [Rev Urol. 2014;16(4):172-180 doi: 10.3909/riu0644] © 2014 MedReviews®, LLC

Prostate cancer Biomarker Clinical utility Genomic prostate score Adverse pathology Clinical validation Molecular diagnostics

Volume 18, Number 3 Meeting Reviews

Highlights From the 2016 American Urological Association Annual Meeting

Benjamin M Brucker Dean G Assimos Ellen Shapiro Alan W Partin Michael B Chancellor Stacy Loeb J Curtis Nickel Michael A Gorin Michael K Brawer

More than 2000 posters, abstracts, and videos were presented at the 2016 American Urological Association (AUA) Annual Meeting, held in San Diego, CA, from May 6 to 10, 2016. The editors of Reviews in Urology have culled an enormous volume of information from this premier source and present the findings that are most relevant to the practicing urologist. [Rev Urol. 2016;18(3):159-173 doi:10.3909/riu0717] © 2016 MedReviews®, LLC

Prostate cancer Active surveillance Disorders of sexual development Nephrolithiasis Overactive bladder Microbiome OnabotulinumtoxinA Hemorrhagic cystitis Inflammation Four kallikrein assay Genomic prostate score