Authors

Main Content

Top Content

Directory of Authors from the Journal and their last article.

Scott I ZeitlinView Articles
Scott M LuciaView Articles
Scott MacDiarmidView Articles
Scott Tully JrView Articles

Volume 19, Number 2Review Articles

The American Urological Association’s Prostate Cancer Screening Guideline: Which Cancers Will Be Missed in Average-risk Men Aged 40 to 54 Years?

Cancer Screening Update

Thomas E MoodyCurtis L SpraitzarElizabeth EisenhartScott Tully Jr

To determine the impact of the American Urological Association’s (AUA) guideline for early detection of prostate cancer that recommends against routine screening in men aged 40 to 54 years at average risk (eg, white men without a family history of prostate cancer), we undertook a study of 973 men who previously underwent a prostate biopsy at Urology Centers of Alabama (UCA) over the 5-year period from 2010 to 2014. We retrospectively reviewed the results of the prostate biopsies performed by urologists at UCA—and, where applicable, the final surgical pathology results and compared the results by race and family history. In white men with a family history of prostate cancer, 47% had cancer and 30% had Gleason score (GS) ≥ 7 disease. In white men without a family history of prostate cancer, 32% had cancer and 23% had GS ≥ 7 disease. By comparison, in African American men with a family history of prostate cancer, 56% had cancer and 42% had GS ≥ 7 disease. In African American men without a family history, 42% had cancer and 29% had GS ≥ 7 disease. In our study, 144 of 456 (32%) of the group of average-risk men had cancer and 105 of 456 (23%) had GS ≥ 7 cancer. Had the AUA guidelines been followed, these cancers would have been missed or the diagnoses delayed. [Rev Urol. 2017;19(2):106–112 doi: 10.3909/riu0748] © 2017 MedReviews®, LLC

Prostate cancerProstate-specific antigenAUA screening guidelineAverage-risk men

Seamus TeahanView Articles
Sean P StroupView Articles

Volume 9, Number 4Case Review

Bilateral Testicular Infarction and Orchiectomy as a Complication of Polyarteritis Nodosa

Case Review

Donald S CrainShannon R HerreraSean P Stroup

We report an unusual case of a 28-year-old male with constitutional symptoms and bilateral testicular pain. After diagnosis of cytomegalovirus (CMV) hepatitis, his constitutional symptoms and testicular pain worsened despite treatment for epididymoorchitis. Ultrasound was concerning for infarction. Exploration in the operating room revealed bilateral testicular infarction requiring bilateral orchiectomy with subsequent androgen hormone replacement. Pathologic diagnosis was polyarteritis nodosa (PAN). PAN is a rare systemic vasculitis that affects multiple organs. There are no previous reports of PAN-induced vasculitis leading to bilateral testicular infarction and bilateral orchiectomy. [Rev Urol. 2007;9(4):235-238]

Testicular infarctionPolyarteritis nodosaAndrogen replacement therapy

Selahattin ÇalIiskanView Articles

Volume 17, Number 3Case Review

Retroperitoneal Ancient Schwannoma: A Case Report

Selahattin ÇalIiskanGülistan GümrükçüCevdet Kaya

Schwannomas are extremely rare tumors that are composed of Schwann cells. Retroperitoneal localization comprises 0.7% to 2.6% of all schwannomas. Patients usually present with nonspecific symptoms. There are no pathognomonic features on radiologic evaluation. Preoperative biopsy is not recommended because of complication risks; however, surgery is necessary for diagnosis and treatment. Although most schwannomas are benign tumors, those that are associated with von Recklinghausen disease are malignant. Schwannomas exhibit regions of high and low cellularity, termed Antoni A and Antoni B areas, with a diffuse positivity of S100 protein on pathologic evaluation. If there are degenerative changes, such as cyst formation, hemorrhage, calcification, and hyalinization, these tumors are termed ancient schwannomas. We present a case of retroperitoneal ancient schwannoma. [Rev Urol. 2015;17(3):190-193 doi: 10.3909/riu0638] © 2015 MedReviews®, LLC

Retroperitoneal schwannomaNeurilemmomaSchwannomaRetroperitoneal tumor

Selahattin CaliskanView Articles

Volume 17, Number 4Case Review

Sorafenib-induced Scrotal Eczema

Selahattin Caliskan

Sorafenib is an orally active, small-molecule multikinase inhibitor that blocks tumor cell proliferation and angiogenesis. Studies have shown that it is a highly potent, selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 2 and 3, platelet-derived growth factor-β, RAF, FLT-3, and c-Kit. This drug was recently approved for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. We report a case of a patient treated with sorafenib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma who developed scrotal eczema. [Rev Urol. 2015;17(4):250-251 doi: 10.3909/riu0648] © 2016 MedReviews®, LLC

SorafenibScrotal eczemaHand-foot skin reaction

Semra OlgacView Articles

Volume 21, Number 2Case Review

Intraperitoneal Rupture of a Synovial Sarcoma of the Kidney

Andrew StammPaul KozlowskiNeal ContiSemra OlgacJohn Paul FloresMichael J Wagner

Primary renal synovial sarcoma is an aggressive, extremely rare disease. Nearly all reported cases are characterized by SYT-SSX gene translocation (X;18)(p11;q11). We describe the case of a 43-year-old woman who presented with an intraperitoneal rupture of this rare sarcoma followed by a right radical nephrectomy. Follow-up imaging 1 month after surgery revealed peritoneal carcinomatosis. She began systemic chemotherapy with doxorubicin and dacarbazine, progressed after 3 months, and is currently receiving single-agent ifosfamide. Only one instance of intraperitoneal rupture has been reported previously. This case report contributes to the characterization of this rare disease. [Rev Urol. 2019;21(2/3):141–143] © 2019 MedReviews®, LLC

Kidney cancerOncologyRenal synovial sarcoma

Sender HerschornView Articles
Serge G SrourView Articles

Volume 22, Number 2Review Articles

The Role of Multiparametric MRI and MRI-targeted Biopsy in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the Community Setting: A Retrospective Study

Original Research

Kenneth E SchmankeJordan J StiversonRosalee E ZackulaSerge G SrourMatthew P LierzFadi N Joudi

Multiparametric MRI and the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) have emerged as tools to reveal suspicious prostate lesions and MRI-targeted biopsy has shown potential to avoid repeat prostate biopsies and miss fewer significant cancers. This retrospective study sought to assess the differences in diagnostic yield and sampling efficiency between MRI-targeted and standard biopsies in a community urology practice. We concluded that MRI-targeted biopsy was more efficient than a standard biopsy, although neither technique achieved a superior diagnostic yield of clinically significant cancer in our community setting. We recommend that a standard biopsy be performed alongside targeted biopsy. [Rev Urol. 2020;22(2):57–66] © 2020 MedReviews®, LLC

Health services researchProstatic neoplasmsImage-guided biopsyMultiparametric MRIAmbulatory care facilities

Seth D CohenView Articles
Seth P LernerView Articles
Shachi TyagiView Articles

Volume 8, Number 3Meeting Reviews

Best of the 2006 AUA Annual Meeting

Meeting Review

Danil V MakarovEllen ShapiroAlan W PartinMichael B ChancellorVictor W NittiJ Curtis NickelJacob RajferClaus G RoehrbornMichael K BrawerArie S BelldegrunJohn P SteinJohn P MulhallTobias KlatteMichael E AldridgeLi-Ming SuShachi Tyagi

Highlights from the 2006 Annual Meeting of the American Urological Association May 20–25, 2006 Atlanta, GA

Prostate cancerInfertilityBenign prostatic hyperplasiaBladder cancerKidney cancerLower urinary tract symptomsBladder exstrophyOveractive bladderInterstitial cystitisStress urinary incontinencePeyronie’s diseaseSpina bifidaNeurogenic bladderErectile dysfunctionChronic pelvic pain syndromeChronic prostatitisTumor markersAndrogen replacement therapyEjaculatory dysfunctionAnorectal malformationsRenal stonesRobotic-assisted radical prostatectomy

Shagnik RayView Articles

Volume 22, Number 1Review Articles

Active Surveillance for Small Renal Masses

Management Review

Shagnik RayJoseph G CheaibPhillip M Pierorazio

Active surveillance (AS) is a safe and reasonable management strategy for many patients with small renal masses (SRM) suspicious for a clinical T1a renal cell carcinoma based on excellent metastasis-free and cancer-specific survival. However, the expansion of robotic extirpation of SRM has outpaced the adoption of AS, resulting in the possibility of overtreatment for select patients with SRM, especially the elderly and comorbid. In this review of AS for SRM, with a focus on the Delayed Intervention and Surveillance for Small Renal Masses (DISSRM) Registry, we detail the rationale behind AS, review lessons learned from the past decades of literature, and offer suggestions for appropriate patient selection and follow-up. An improved understanding of the data supporting AS will empower physicians and patients to more comfortably pursue AS to avoid overtreatment and provide individualized care to patients with SRM. [Rev Urol. 2020;22(1):9–16] © 2020 MedReviews®, LLC

Renal cell carcinomaSmall renal massActive surveillanceRenal mass biopsyChest imaging

Shahrokh F ShariatView Articles
Shailen S SehgalView Articles

Volume 12, Number 4Case Review

Neuroendocrine Tumor of the Bladder

Alan J WeinShailen S SehgalZhanyong BingThomas J Guzzo

Small cell carcinoma (SCC) of the bladder is a rare and aggressive tumor associated with a poor prognosis. It often presents at a later stage than urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, and comprises less than 1% of bladder malignancies. A number of treatment algorithms have been used to treat bladder SCC, including cystectomy, partial cystectomy, radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, chemotherapy alone, and neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy. Presented is a case of SCC of the bladder, and the epidemiology, prognosis, and current treatment algorithms for patients with bladder SCC are reviewed.[Rev Urol. 2010;12(4):e197-e201 doi: 10.3909/riu0492]©2010 MedReviews®, LLC

Bladder cancerNeuroendocrine tumorsSmall cell carcinoma

Shaker DakhilView Articles

Volume 22, Number 3Case Review

From Radical to Partial Nephrectomy in the Setting of Solitary Functioning Kidney: Neoadjuvant Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma

David D WatsonNicole G FarhaK James KallailShaker DakhilA J Farha

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This case evaluates the use of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for localized RCC in a patient with solitary functioning kidney. A retrospective chart review was conducted between September 2019 and January 2020 on a single patient. Before treatment, the tumor was 7 cm × 8 cm × 8.5 cm. The patient trialed nivolumab + ipilimumab then cabozantinib. The tumor shrunk to 6.3 cm × 5.5 cm and was removed via partial nephrectomy. This case demonstrates the efficacy of immunotherapy in neoadjuvant treatment of RCC. Expansion of guidelines could allow for patients with RCC to undergo partial nephrectomy. [Rev Urol. 2020;22(3):126-129] © 2020 MedReviews®, LLC

Renal cell carcinomaImmunotherapyNeoadjuvant immunotherapySolitary kidney

Shalini S YadavView Articles

Volume 19, Number 4Review Articles

The Use of Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer Screening and Treatment

Treatment Update

Joseph Renzulli IIAshley V AlfordJoseph M Brito IIIKamlesh K YadavShalini S YadavAshutosh K Tewari

Prostate cancer screening and diagnosis has been guided by prostate-specific antigen levels for the past 25 years, but with the most recent US Preventive Services Task Force screening recommendations, as well as concerns regarding overdiagnosis and overtreatment, a new wave of prostate cancer biomarkers has recently emerged. These assays allow the testing of urine, serum, or prostate tissue for molecular signs of prostate cancer, and provide information regarding both diagnosis and prognosis. In this review, we discuss 12 commercially available biomarker assays approved for the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. The results of clinical validation studies and clinical decision-making studies are presented. This information is designed to assist urologists in making clinical decisions with respect to ordering and interpreting these tests for different patients. There are numerous fluid and biopsy-based genomic tests available for prostate cancer patients that provide the physician and patient with different information about risk of future disease and treatment outcomes. It is important that providers be able to recommend the appropriate test for each individual patient; this decision is based on tissue availability and prognostic information desired. Future studies will continue to emphasize the important role of genomic biomarkers in making individualized treatment decisions for prostate cancer patients. [Rev Urol. 2017;19(4):221–234 doi: 10.3909/riu0772] © 2018 MedReviews®, LLC

Prostate cancerBiomarkers4KscoreProlarisPCA3Prostate Health IndexApifinyMichigan Prostate ScoreSelectMDxConfirmMDxProMarkPTEN/TMPRSS2:ERGDecipher

Shandra WilsonView Articles