Volume 23, Number 3Prostate CancerDarolutamide for the Management of Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Urologist-Oncologist PerspectivePaul DatoRana R. McKayMetastatic prostate cancer accounts for 8% of all prostate cancer cases in the United States and has an estimated 5-year survival rate of 34%. Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) is the cornerstone of treatment for men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC), but there has been a recent focus on early treatment intensification through dual- or triple-therapy approaches, which have shown substantial survival benefit compared with ADT alone. Darolutamide, a distinct androgen receptor inhibitor, is the latest treatment for men with metastatic HSPC. In the Darolutamide in Addition to Standard Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Docetaxel in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer (ARASENS) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02799602), darolutamide in combination with ADT and docetaxel reduced the risk of death by 32.5% (P < .001) compared with ADT plus docetaxel in men with metastatic HSPC. The most recent National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines (2023) support the use of triple-therapy regimens for men with high-volume metastatic HSPC, but concerns about the side effects of the short-term chemotherapy component of this regimen necessitate a comprehensive approach to providing supportive care to ensure that patients are willing to begin and remain on treatment. Effective management should involve a well-informed multidisciplinary team with patient education and support to ensure optimal treatment outcomes. Here, we review the results of the ARASENS trial and consider the implications for the management of metastatic HSPC. By showing a statistically significant reduction in risk of death, triple therapy combining darolutamide with ADT and docetaxel has emerged as a new treatment modality that may help men with metastatic HSPC achieve prolonged survival while maintaining an acceptable quality of life.Prostatic neoplasmsDrug therapyNeoplasm metastasisAndrogen receptor antagonists
Volume 22, Number 4Review ArticlesLow Penetrance Germline Genetic Testing: Role for Risk Stratification in Prostate Cancer Screening and Examples From Clinical PracticeManagement UpdateGerald L AndrioleFranklin GaylisKelly K BreePaul DatoChristopher J KaneA Karim KaderBroad-based prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening has saved lives but at a substantial human and financial cost. One way of mitigating this harm, while maintaining and possibly improving the benefit, is by focusing screening efforts on men at higher risk. With age, race, and family history as the only risk factors, many men lack any reliable data to inform their prostate cancer (PCa) screening decisions. Complexities including history of previous negative biopsies, interpretation of negative and/or equivocal mpMRI findings, and patient comorbidities further compound the already complicated decisions surrounding PCa screening and early detection. The authors present cases that provide real-world examples of how a single nucleotide polymorphism–based test can provide patients and providers with personalized PCa risk assessments and allow for development of improved risk-stratified screening regimens. [Rev Urol. 2020;22(4):152–158] © 2021 MedReviews®, LLCProstate cancer screeningRisk stratificationSomatic DNA testGermline DNA testsSingle nucleotide polymorphism DNA test