Introduction

INTRODUCTION Combining Forces: Joining Urologists and Medical/Radiation Oncologists to Optimize Treatment for Advanced Prostate Cancer Mario A. Eisenberger, MD Supplement Editor, Combining Forces: Joining Urologists and Medical/Radiation Oncologists to Optimize Treatment for Advanced Prostate Cancer Departments of Oncology and Urology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD [Rev Urol. 2003;5(suppl 2):S1–S2] © 2003 MedReviews, LLC he long-overdue addition of chemotherapy to the list of treatments available for prostate cancer has provided an entirely new perspective on the overall management of this prevalent disease. A consistent rate of therapeutic benefit has been reported with docetaxel alone or in combination with other cytotoxic agents in Phase II trials. Phase III trials of these regimens are currently in progress and may demonstrate a survival advantage over symptomatic treatment with mitoxantrone plus prednisone, in patients with hormone-refractory disease. Many of these data are illustrated herein and they make a strong case for prostate cancer’s chemosensitivity. In addition to the patient benefit provided by the introduction of a new treatment modality, new opportunities for research have emerged. The findings from these trials provide the rationale for the exploration of new, docetaxel-based combinations and other therapeutic options. Over the past five years there has been a marked increase in the number of patients enrolled in clinical trials, and an increased number of trials involving these new therapeutic approaches for prostate cancer. The introduction of active, non-hormonal, cytotoxic chemotherapy has led to exploratory studies evaluating the feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of this modality in the adjuvant T VOL. 5 SUPPL. 2 2003 REVIEWS IN UROLOGY S1 Introduction continued setting and in early stages of the disease. The evolving data on neoadjuvant treatment and combined chemoradiation for patients with locally advanced disease is also discussed in this supplement, along with recently activated studies in the post-surgical adjuvant setting and in patients with biochemically relapsed disease (both in hormone-naïve and androgen-deprived patients). The encouraging results of these chemotherapy trials have generated increased interest from practicing healthcare professionals and researchsponsoring agencies. A survey con- S2 VOL. 5 SUPPL. 2 2003 ducted by the American Urological Association indicates that 48% of urologists express a high or extremely high interest in administering chemotherapy. To this end, models for multidisciplinary interaction, and the urologist’s role within them, are also discussed. Despite the steady increase in funding for cancer research over the last decade, there is always the need for additional support. One of the most active supporters of peer-reviewed prostate cancer research is CaP CURE, an organization founded in 1993, which has substantially con- REVIEWS IN UROLOGY tributed to awareness, among clinicians and funding institutions, of new and potentially important avenues for investigation. Among its various accomplishments, CaP CURE has created a clinical therapy consortium, which focuses on early translational research in prostate cancer. In summary, this supplement provides the reader with a broad view of the multidisciplinary efforts currently in progress in prostate cancer research and treatment. It is hoped that this work will result in a tangible benefit to patients in the near future.