The Role of Varicocelectomy and Diagnostic Testis Biopsy in Men With Non-obstructive Azoospermia

NYU Case of the Month, July 2020

Case of the Month The Role of Varicocelectomy and Diagnostic Testis Biopsy in Men With Non-obstructive Azoospermia NYU Case of the Month, July 2020 Bobby B. Najari, MD Departments of Urology and Population Health, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY [Rev Urol. 2020;22(3):130–132] © 2020 MedReviews®, LLC A 37-year-old man presented with primary infertility of 12 months’ duration. His wife was 30 years old and had not undergone a fertility evaluation. The couple had been having properly timed and unprotected intercourse for 12 months. The patient denied any sexual dysfunction. He had no past medical history, never had surgery, and did not take any medications. He denied smoking or using illicit drugs and had no relevant family history. He worked as a physician and denied genital trauma or exposure to toxic or radioactive agents. Evaluation, Treatment, and Management The patient had a normal masculine hair distribution. His BMI was 23.7. No gynecomastia was present. Testes bilaterally were soft and approximately 7 cc on the right and 6 cc on the left (normal volume, $18 cc). He had a grade 3 left varicocele and no right varicocele. His epididymis and vas deferens were normal bilaterally. The patient had 2 semen analyses that showed normal-volume azoospermia. He also had an endocrine evaluation that demonstrated normal testosterone of 426 ng/dL (normal range, 300-890 ng/dL) and elevated follicle stimulating hormone of 24.1 mIU/mL (normal range, 1.5-12.4 mIU/mL). He had a genetic evaluation, which detected no Y chromosome microdeletions and showed a 46,XY karyotype. The patient’s wife was referred to a reproductive endocrinologist, and her evaluation was normal. The couple was counseled on their options, which included proceeding directly with microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) with in vitro fertility with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI), left varicocelectomy without diagnostic testis biopsy, or left varicocelectomy with diagnostic testis biopsy. The patient elected to undergo left microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy with a diagnostic testis biopsy. The diagnostic testis biopsy was done through the subinguinal incision by delivering the testis into the operative field; the histopathologic diagnosis was hypospermatogenesis. During the subsequent 12 months, the patient had semen analyses performed every 3 months, all of which remained azoospermic. Twelve months after the varicocele repair, the patient underwent a mTESE that successfully yielded sperm. The couple had a live birth after 2 rounds of IVF-ICSI. Comment Varicocele, or dilation of the pampiniform plexus, occurs in 15% of young men.1 Varicocelectomy is indicated in infertile men with a clinically palpable 130 • Vol. 22 No. 3 • 2020 • Reviews in Urology 4170020_09_RIU088A1_V3_ptg01.indd 130 19/10/20 3:17 PM Varicocelectomy and Diagnostic Testis Biopsy varicocele, abnormal semen analyses, and a partner with normal fertility.2 Azoospermia, or a lack of sperm in the ejaculate, occurs in about 1% of men, and 60% of these men will have nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA), or azoospermia due to a severe defect in spermatogenesis.3,4 Although these men lack sperm in the ejaculate, mTESE enables a skilled surgeon to identify focal areas of spermatogenesis within the testes for use with IVF-ICSI. Diagnostic testis biopsy provides an estimate of the severity of spermatogenic dysfunction in men with NOA and can predict mTESE outcome. Varicocele repair and diagnostic testis biopsy should be considered in the management of men with NOA who have a clinical varicocele. Return of Sperm to Ejaculate The ideal outcome for repairing a clinical varicocele in a patient with NOA is the return of sperm to the ejaculate.5 Presence of sperm in the ejaculate will enable a patient to avoid undergoing a second procedure for sperm retrieval. In addition to avoiding the short-term morbidity of another surgery, the potential long-term complication of testosterone deficiency is also avoided in men who can forgo mTESE.6 In a brief 2020 literature review on the effectiveness of varicocele repair in men with NOA, 222 of 751 men (29.5%) experienced a return of sperm to their ejaculate.7 In a more detailed meta-analysis in 2016, sperm was found in the postoperative ejaculate of 151 of 344 men (43.9%).8 Return of sperm to the ejaculate ranged from 20.8% to 55.0% of men, depending on the study, and the average sperm concentration was 1.8 3 106/mL, with an average motility of 22.9%. Although not indicated in most studies, the time from varicocele repair to return of sperm in the ejaculate varied from 4.5 months to 11 months. Impressively, 13.6% of men with return of sperm to their ejaculate were able to conceive naturally. It should be noted, however, that the return of sperm to the ejaculate may not persist, so patients should always be advised to cryopreserve in case they experience an azoospermia relapse. Most men with NOA and a clinical varicocele should not expect a return of sperm to their ejaculate after treatment of their varicocele. However, if female age does not preclude waiting a year for the benefits of varicocele repair to manifest, close to a third of these men will see sperm return to their ejaculate. The possibility of avoiding mTESE, or even of conceiving naturally, will make varicocele treatment appealing to many men with NOA and a varicocele. Sperm Retrieval Rate Testicular sperm extraction with IVF-ICSI is the only mechanism by which most men with NOA with be able to father a child. Given that most men will not see a return of sperm to their ejaculate after a varicocele repair, the outcomes of mTESE are relevant to men with NOA and a varicocele. Unfortunately, there are rel­ atively few controlled studies of men undergoing mTESE after varicocele repair.9-11 According to these studies, the sperm retrieval rate in men with NOA who underwent mTESE after varicocele repair was 57.2% (91/159) versus 36.5% (88/241) in men who underwent mTESE but did not undergo prior varicocele repair. The odds ratio for finding sperm at mTESE is 2.65 (95% confidence interval, 1.69-4.14; P , 0.0001) in favor of men who underwent varicocele repair.8 Unfortunately, there is significant heterogeneity among these studies, including how the control groups were chosen. Furthermore, the duration of time between varicocele repair and mTESE varies from as little as 3 months to more than 2 years. Despite these limitations, the signal toward improved sperm retrieval rates in men with NOA after a varicocele is repaired is compelling. The Role of Diagnostic Testis Biopsy at Time of Varicocelectomy An isolated diagnostic testis biopsy has a limited role in the modern management of men with a clear diagnosis of NOA.12 Given the potentially focal nature of spermatogenesis in men with NOA, a significant portion of men undergoing mTESE will have a successful procedure, regardless of the histology shown on a diagnostic testis biopsy.13 Even though a diagnostic testis biopsy will not often change the management of men with NOA, testicular histopathology remains the strongest predictor of mTESE outcome.14 In men with NOA and clinical varicocele, the minimal added morbidity of a diagnostic testis biopsy at time of varicocelectomy may be worth the prognostic information gained. As mentioned, testicular histopathology at the time of varicocelectomy is a strong pre­dictor of the recovery of sperm to the ejaculate of men with NOA.8 Although sperm was found in the postoperative ejaculate of 9.7% (6/62) of men with Sertoli cell–only histology, 35.3% (18/51) of men with maturation arrest had return of sperm to their ejaculate, and 56.2% (27/48) of men with hypospermatogenesis had return of sperm. When differentiating between early and late maturation arrest, 20% (2/10) of men with early maturation arrest will experience return of sperm to the ejaculate compared with 47% Vol. 22 No. 3 • 2020 • Reviews in Urology • 131 4170020_09_RIU088A1_V3_ptg01.indd 131 19/10/20 3:17 PM Varicocelectomy and Diagnostic Testis Biopsy continued (8/17) of men with later maturation arrest.15 It is clear that the degree of spermatogenic impairment found on testis biopsy inversely correlates with the likelihood of return of sperm to the ejaculate. The result of diagnostic testis biopsy at the time of varicocelectomy is also highly correlated with the sperm retrieval results at the time of mTESE. Of men who did not have return of sperm to their ejaculate at least 1 year after varicocele repair, sperm retrieval was successful in 20% (7/35) with Sertoli cell–only histology, in 40% (2/5) with early maturation arrest, in 67% (6/9) with late maturation arrest, and in 100% (4/4) with hypospermatogenesis.15 Although even a poor histopathology result should not dissuade a man with NOA from proceeding with mTESE, reducing the wide range of sperm retrieval rates into a more accurate individual percentage may be of benefit when counseling patients. Sperm Retrieval After Varicocele Repair The method and timing of sperm retrieval after varicocele repair should be considered.16 Testicular sperm aspiration (TESA) involves using a needle to percutaneously aspirate testicular tissue. Conventional testicular sperm extraction (cTESE) entails extracting testicular tissue through one or more small testicular incisions. Finally, mTESE involves making a large testicular incision that maximally exposes seminiferous tubules and using optical magnification to select larger seminiferous tubules. In a meta-analysis comparing sperm retrieval techniques, mTESE was 1.5-fold more successful than cTESE, and cTESE was 2.0-fold more successful than TESA.17 Although all these techniques are therapeutic options that can be offered to a patient with NOA, many reproductive surgeons will elect mTESE because of the focal nature of spermatogenesis in these men. There is no defined optimal time duration between varicocele repair and mTESE. A minimum of 3 months is recommended, given that this is a typical cycle of spermatogenesis.16 However, it can be helpful to be mindful of the velocity of improvement in semen analysis parameters after varicocele repair in men with severe oligospermia (sperm concentration ,5 million/ mL).18 Although the time frame for most improvements is 3 to 6 months after varicocele repair, modest further improvements are also seen in 6 to 12 months. Generally, we perform mTESE 6 to 12 months after varicocelectomy, depending on the female’s age and the patient’s preference. Conclusions The management of varicocele in men with NOA is challenging because of the dearth of well- performed studies. However, there are multiple apparent benefits to varicocelectomy in men with NOA. A significant number of these men will have a return of sperm to their ejaculate, mitigating the need for a surgical sperm retrieval. Even in treated men who still require mTESE, varicocelectomy appears to improve the sperm retrieval rate. Diagnostic testis biopsy at the time of varicocelectomy adds minimal morbidity while offering useful prognostic information both on the likelihood of return of sperm to the ejaculate and on mTESE outcome. The surgeon should wait at least 3 months after the patient’s varicocelectomy to perform a mTESE. References 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. Damsgaard J, Joensen UN, Carlsen E, et al. Varicocele is associated with impaired semen quality and reproductive hormone levels: a study of 7035 healthy young men from six European countries. Eur Urol. 2016;70:1019-1029. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Society for Male Reproduction and Urology. Report on varicocele and infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:1556-1560. Willott GM. Frequency of azoospermia. Forensic Sci Int. 1982;20:9-10. Jarow JP, Espeland MA, Lipshultz LI. Evaluation of the azoospermic patient. J Urol. 1989;142:62-65. Matthews GJ, Matthews ED, Goldstein M. Induction of spermatogenesis and achievement of pregnancy after microsurgical varicocelectomy in men with azoospermia and severe oligoasthenospermia. Fertil Steril. 1998;70:71-75. Takada S, Tsujimura A, Ueda T, et al. Androgen decline in patients with nonobstructive azoospemia [sic] after microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Urology. 2008;72:114-118. Elbardisi H, El Ansari W, Majzoub A, Arafa M. Does varicocelectomy improve semen in men with azoospermia and clinically palpable varicocele? Andrologia. 2020;52:e13486. Esteves SC, Miyaoka R, Roque M, Agarwal A. Outcome of varicocele repair in men with nonobstructive azoospermia: systematic review and metaanalysis. Asian J Androl. 2016;18:246-253. Inci K, Hascicek M, Kara O, et al. Sperm retrieval and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in men with nonobstructive azoospermia, and treated and untreated varicocele. J Urol. 2009;182:1500-1505. Haydardedeoglu B, Turunc T, Kilicdag EB, et al. The effect of prior varicocelectomy in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia on intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes: a retrospective pilot study. Urology. 2010;75:83-86. Zampieri N, Bosaro L, Costantini C, et al. Relationship between testicular sperm extraction and varicocelectomy in patients with varicocele and nonobstructive azoospermia. Urology. 2013;82:74-77. Jarow J, Sigman M, Kolettis P, et al. The evaluation of the azoospermic male: AUA Best Practice Statement. American Urological Association website. https:// www.auanet.org/guidelines/azoospermic-male-bestpractice-statement. Reviewed and amended 2011. Accessed September 15, 2020. Kalsi J, Thum MY, Muneer A, et al. In the era of micro-dissection sperm retrieval (m-TESE) is an isolated testicular biopsy necessary in the management of men with non-obstructive azoospermia? BJU Int. 2012;109:418-424. Bernie AM, Ramasamy R, Schlegel PN. Predictive factors of successful microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Basic Clin Androl. 2013;23:5. Shiraishi K, Oka S, Matsuyama H. Predictive factors for sperm recovery after varicocelectomy in men with nonobstructive azoospermia. J Urol. 2017;197: 485-490. The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Management of nonobstructive azoospermia: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2018;110:1239-1245. Bernie AM, Mata DA, Ramasamy R, Schlegel PN. Comparison of microdissection testicular sperm extraction, conventional testicular sperm extraction, and testicular sperm aspiration for nonobstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:1099-103.e1-3. Masterson TA, Greer AB, Ramasamy R. Time to improvement in semen parameters after microsurgical varicocelectomy in men with severe oligospermia. Can Urol Assoc J. 2019;13:E66-E69. 132 • Vol. 22 No. 3 • 2020 • Reviews in Urology 4170020_09_RIU088A1_V3_ptg01.indd 132 19/10/20 3:17 PM